In this paper we show that visual diffusion models can serve as effective geometric solvers: they can directly reason about geometric problems by working in pixel space. We first demonstrate this on the Inscribed Square Problem, a long-standing problem in geometry that asks whether every Jordan curve contains four points forming a square. We then extend the approach to two other well-known hard geometric problems: the Steiner Tree Problem and the Simple Polygon Problem. Our method treats each problem instance as an image and trains a standard visual diffusion model that transforms Gaussian noise into an image representing a valid approximate solution that closely matches the exact one. The model learns to transform noisy geometric structures into correct configurations, effectively recasting geometric reasoning as image generation. Unlike prior work that necessitates specialized architectures and domain-specific adaptations when applying diffusion to parametric geometric representations, we employ a standard visual diffusion model that operates on the visual representation of the problem. This simplicity highlights a surprising bridge between generative modeling and geometric problem solving. Beyond the specific problems studied here, our results point toward a broader paradigm: operating in image space provides a general and practical framework for approximating notoriously hard problems, and opens the door to tackling a far wider class of challenging geometric tasks.

Spanning tree problems with specialized constraints can be difficult to solve in real-world scenarios, often requiring intricate algorithmic design and exponential time. Recently, there has been growing interest in end-to-end deep neural networks for solving routing problems. However, such methods typically produce sequences of vertices, which makes it difficult to apply them to general combinatorial optimization problems where the solution set consists of edges, as in various spanning tree problems. In this paper, we propose NeuroPrim, a novel framework for solving various spanning tree problems by defining a Markov Decision Process (MDP) for general combinatorial optimization problems on graphs. Our approach reduces the action and state space using Prim's algorithm and trains the resulting model using REINFORCE. We apply our framework to three difficult problems on Euclidean space: the Degree-constrained Minimum Spanning Tree (DCMST) problem, the Minimum Routing Cost Spanning Tree (MRCST) problem, and the Steiner Tree Problem in graphs (STP). Experimental results on literature instances demonstrate that our model outperforms strong heuristics and achieves small optimality gaps of up to 250 vertices. Additionally, we find that our model has strong generalization ability, with no significant degradation observed on problem instances as large as 1000. Our results suggest that our framework can be effective for solving a wide range of combinatorial optimization problems beyond spanning tree problems.

Graph neural networks are useful for learning problems, as well as for combinatorial and graph problems such as the Subgraph Isomorphism Problem and the Traveling Salesman Problem. We describe an approach for computing Steiner Trees by combining a graph neural network and Monte Carlo Tree Search. We first train a graph neural network that takes as input a partial solution and proposes a new node to be added as output. This neural network is then used in a Monte Carlo search to compute a Steiner tree. The proposed method consistently outperforms the standard 2-approximation algorithm on many different types of graphs and often finds the optimal solution.

We consider the Steiner tree problem on graphs where we are given a set of nodes and the goal is to find a tree sub-graph of minimum weight that contains all nodes in the given set, potentially including additional nodes. This is a classical NP-hard combinatorial optimisation problem. In recent years, a machine learning framework called learning-to-prune has been successfully used for solving a diverse range of combinatorial optimisation problems. In this paper, we use this learning framework on the Steiner tree problem and show that even on this problem, the learning-to-prune framework results in computing near-optimal solutions at a fraction of the time required by commercial ILP solvers. Our results underscore the potential of the learning-to-prune framework in solving various combinatorial optimisation problems.

The Euclidean Steiner tree problem seeks the min-cost network to connect a collection of target locations, and it underlies many applications of wireless networks. In this paper, we present a study on solving the Euclidean Steiner tree problem using reinforcement learning enhanced by graph representation learning. Different from the commonly studied connectivity problems like travelling salesman problem or vehicle routing problem where the search space is finite, the Euclidean Steiner tree problem requires to search over the entire Euclidean space, thereby making the existing methods not applicable. In this paper, we design discretization methods by leveraging the unique characteristics of the Steiner tree, and propose new training schemes for handling the dynamic Steiner points emerging during the incremental construction. Our design is examined through a sanity check using experiments on a collection of datasets, with encouraging results demonstrating the utility of our method as an alternative to classic combinatorial methods.

Steiner Tree Problem (STP) in graphs aims to find a tree of minimum weight in the graph that connects a given set of vertices. It is a classic NP-hard combinatorial optimization problem and has many real-world applications (e.g., VLSI chip design, transportation network planning and wireless sensor networks). Many exact and approximate algorithms have been developed for STP, but they suffer from high computational complexity and weak worst-case solution guarantees, respectively. Heuristic algorithms are also developed. However, each of them requires application domain knowledge to design and is only suitable for specific scenarios. Motivated by the recently reported observation that instances of the same NP-hard combinatorial problem may maintain the same or similar combinatorial structure but mainly differ in their data, we investigate the feasibility and benefits of applying machine learning techniques to solving STP. To this end, we design a novel model Vulcan based on novel graph neural networks and deep reinforcement learning. The core of Vulcan is a novel, compact graph embedding that transforms highdimensional graph structure data (i.e., path-changed information) into a low-dimensional vector representation. Given an STP instance, Vulcan uses this embedding to encode its pathrelated information and sends the encoded graph to a deep reinforcement learning component based on a double deep Q network (DDQN) to find solutions. In addition to STP, Vulcan can also find solutions to a wide range of NP-hard problems (e.g., SAT, MVC and X3C) by reducing them to STP. We implement a prototype of Vulcan and demonstrate its efficacy and efficiency with extensive experiments using real-world and synthetic datasets.

The expansion of Fiber-To-The-Home (FTTH) networks creates high costs due to expensive excavation procedures. Optimizing the planning process and minimizing the cost of the earth excavation work therefore lead to large savings. Mathematically, the FTTH network problem can be described as a minimum Steiner Tree problem. Even though the Steiner Tree problem has already been investigated intensively in the last decades, it might be further optimized with the help of new computing paradigms and emerging approaches. This work studies upcoming technologies, such as Quantum Annealing, Simulated Annealing and nature-inspired methods like Evolutionary Algorithms or slime-mold-based optimization. Additionally, we investigate partitioning and simplifying methods. Evaluated on several real-life problem instances, we could outperform a traditional, widely-used baseline (NetworkX Approximate Solver) on most of the domains. Prior partitioning of the initial graph and the presented slime-mold-based approach were especially valuable for a cost-efficient approximation. Quantum Annealing seems promising, but was limited by the number of available qubits.

The Steiner tree problem is a well-known problem in network design, routing, and VLSI design. Given a graph, edge costs, and a set of dedicated vertices (terminals), the Steiner tree problem asks to output a sub-graph that connects all terminals at minimum cost. A state-of-the-art algorithm to solve the Steiner tree problem by means of dynamic programming is the Dijkstra-Steiner algorithm. The algorithm builds a Steiner tree of the entire instance by systematically searching for smaller instances, based on subsets of the terminals, and combining Steiner trees for these smaller instances. The search heavily relies on a guiding heuristic function in order to prune the search space. However, to ensure correctness, this algorithm allows only for limited heuristic functions, namely, those that satisfy a so-called consistency condition. In this paper, we enhance the Dijkstra-Steiner algorithm and establish a revisited algorithm, called DS*. The DS* algorithm allows for arbitrary lower bounds as heuristics relaxing the previous condition on the heuristic function. Notably, we can now use linear programming based lower bounds. Further, we capture new requirements for a heuristic function in a condition, which we call admissibility. We show that admissibility is indeed weaker than consistency and establish correctness of the DS* algorithm when using an admissible heuristic function. We implement DS* and combine it with modern preprocessing, resulting in an open-source solver (DS* Solve). Finally, we compare its performance on standard benchmarks and observe a competitive behavior.

This problem is well-known to be NPhard [3]. For our purposes, an edge version is important: Given a subset of edges (instead of vertices), find a connected subgraph of G containing all prescribed edges with the minimal weight. This edge version of Steiner tree problem makes our problem hard even if the limit L is sufficiently large to ensure that only one inert (or chemical) car can maintain all inert roads. In this case, the set of all inert roads may be disconnected so a set of chemical roads has to be added to the inert car's plan to ensure connectivity. Finding such a set of chemical roads with the minimal weight is exactly the edge version of the Steiner tree problem. This kind of reasoning is used in Section 5 to obtain lower bounds on a minimal deadhead.